{"id":174,"date":"2015-03-11T09:59:55","date_gmt":"2015-03-11T09:59:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jcbits.com\/?p=174"},"modified":"2015-03-11T09:59:55","modified_gmt":"2015-03-11T09:59:55","slug":"predicting-the-success-of-a-date-by-a-persons-name","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jcbits.com\/?p=174","title":{"rendered":"Predicting the success of a date by a person’s name"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n \n \"Fb-Button\"\n <\/a>\n <\/div>
<\/fb:like><\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/fb:like>\n\n

\"IMG_0415\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Don’t worry about my looks, only ask me for my name…<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

 <\/p>\n

Fake science\u00a0can be\u00a0very successful.<\/p>\n

Indeed, the diffusion of disciplines like dietology, executive cooking, Bikram yoga,\u00a0Homeopathic medicine,\u00a0tarot reading, and indeed some branches of econometrics forecasting:\u00a0 all of these should be examples of what I think are ultimately not much more than “points of view” now recycled as science.<\/p>\n

Just in case you are a bit confused by the content so far, this is an article about dating advice, however that comes after the prologue.\u00a0 Another two-three paragraphs and we will get there.<\/p>\n

Back to where we were.\u00a0 Many of us (I say “us” because this includes me) like fake sciences and the reassurance\u00a0they give us. Especially when fake science say something\u00a0that what we like and\u00a0their recommendation are\u00a0sufficiently packaged that we can believe there is some substance to the various theories of recommendations.\u00a0 Even if this substance is a bit shallow at best.<\/p>\n

I would like to clarify that I have nothing against esoteric thinking. Actually I am quite attracted to it and I accept the fact that not everything can be explained by science or rational thinking.\u00a0 I welcome the insight that can be derived by astrology, alchemy, KB yoga, cosmic connections and the like.\u00a0 Provided they are not positioned for something they are not.<\/p>\n

I would call the mambo jumbo of disciplines that are presented as science when they are not “fake science”.\u00a0 I distinguish between esoteric disciplines and fake sciences because the former does not try to be considered valuable from a rational perspective, whilst a fake science does.\u00a0 And the only value I attribute to them is that of entertainment.\u00a0 And that is what I like about them.<\/p>\n

Within this context, I also maintain that anyone with sufficient creativity can generate a new fake science, and say something that on the surface might even make sense.\u00a0 And in this article I propose a new theory: the success of a couple, or of a date, can be predicted simply by knowing the first name of the two people who make up\u00a0a couple.<\/p>\n

If you think this is totally bizarre, I would like to state that I am not the only Expert in this field.\u00a0 For example, there is a very popular sms application in Germany where someone can submit two names and the “sms guru” will reply with a rating out of 100 points on the compatibility between the two people.\u00a0 Even offering a commentary on their sexual chemistry, their communication potential and so on.<\/p>\n

The problem with this approach is that you have to send an sms to Germany (let alone know which number to send the sms to).\u00a0 Not only, it is a highly customised answer, each combination of names is treated as unique.<\/p>\n

That is unnecessary, because using my algorithm one can immediately predict how successful a couple would be.<\/p>\n

The rule is simple: take the first name of a man (or the more dominant party in a same-sex couple). The most compatible person is a lady (or a less dominant party in a same-sex couple) whose first name initial is contingent or adjacent by a space of 3.<\/p>\n

Confusing?\u00a0 It does not have to be.\u00a0 I will clarify with an example.<\/p>\n

Since my name is Joseph, I am best matched with a lady whose name starts with J, K, L or M.\u00a0 Simple.\u00a0 Start from J and look at the next three letters.<\/p>\n

For a lady?\u00a0 The reverse rule applies.\u00a0 So if your name is Kelly, than the best match is a K, or a J (like Joseph) or I or H.\u00a0 Or for Anna, it would be Adam, or Ziad, or Yuval or Xavier.<\/p>\n

Change of name?\u00a0 Like you were known as Edward but now everyone calls you Ted?\u00a0 Well you compatible partner will also change.\u00a0 From E, F, G, H to T, U, V, and W.<\/p>\n

I hope many of you will see the great value in this new dating name science.\u00a0 To the sceptics, I would like to remind you that this theory has a very close resemblance to the scientific validity of many diets, self-improvement books, economic projections and methods to make money playing roulette with a double zero.<\/p>\n\n\n<\/fb:like>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Don’t worry about my looks, only ask me for my name…   Fake science\u00a0can be\u00a0very successful. Indeed, the diffusion of disciplines like dietology, executive cooking, Bikram yoga,\u00a0Homeopathic medicine,\u00a0tarot reading, and […]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[6,7],"tags":[143,42,138,140,144,142,139,141],"class_list":["entry","author-joseph-crepaldicrescendopartners-com-au","post-174","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-factoids-and-trivia","category-romance-and-relationships","tag-compatibility","tag-couples","tag-dating","tag-fake-science","tag-fun","tag-love-and-romance","tag-names","tag-succesful-dating"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5MSSY-2O","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jcbits.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jcbits.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jcbits.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jcbits.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jcbits.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=174"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.jcbits.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":178,"href":"https:\/\/www.jcbits.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174\/revisions\/178"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jcbits.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=174"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jcbits.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=174"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jcbits.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=174"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}